It’s a good book for helping kids think about and talk about and process their reactions to the world around them. It’s about a kid having a rough day. From the moment he woke up late, everything seems to go wrong all day long, and as he describes how the day is going, he also describes how he feels, and how those feelings build. At the beginning, he makes a conscious decision to walk to school with his head up even though he feels a little scrunch, because he knows any day can be a good day if you try. But as more problems pile up, his bad day face slips out, even though he’s trying not to let it. He reminds himself that his principal would tell him to keep his head up, so he does, but eventually he has a meltdown. When he’s sent to the principal’s office, he expects her face to be scrunchy, but it’s not. When his parents come to get him, he asks if this day is going to get any better, and his mom says it might, if asks him what he can do if it doesn’t, and he knows the right answer is to keep his head up, but he confesses that he doesn’t really want to, and his principal says he just has to want to try. I like that it’s a very believable, and relatable tale for a lot of kids, and it doesn’t offer a sugar-coated ending that everything’s turned around or he has overcome his feelings. I like that it reminds kids they just have to want to try. The illustrations are full of feeling, too, that support the story nicely.

Well, it is pretty much exactly as the title describes: an old codger opens the book by complaining that the train is late, and then he proceeds to continuously complain about absolutely everything. Luckily the ostrich/emu? taking tickets has a never ending supply of patience as he continuously adjusts things in an attempt to accommodate Mr. Complain. In the end, the train goes through a loop-de-loop that delights Mr. Complain so much he doesn’t want to get off when it reaches his destination. The pictures are cute, and it does invite a certain amount of interaction with the reader, but I guess I don’t have as much patience as our ticket-taker, because I just found it rather pointless. It’s not bad. It’s just not that great.

It’s one of those books for reminding children that they are loved unconditionally. Mama cow is telling her little cow how much she loves it, when she loves it, and what she loves about it, and to keep it silly instead of sappy, it plays on “moo”s throughout. She loves it no matter it’s moo-d, when they’re grooving to moo-sic, and when it’s sch-moo-zing with friends, etc. No child can be told too often how much they’re loved.

It’s the kind of book that invites children in to spend time with it. The illustrations are so full of small detail with lots happening on each two-page spread. The story is a simple one, that of a gnome child who is disappointed to be told he s/he won’t be starting kindergarten for another year, so s/he sets off to spend the first day of school visiting all the forest animals in their different schools, watching how their school day progresses. Each two-page spread shows a cross-section of another school, full of details (both pictorial and small word blurbs) showing all that’s happening at the mouse school, the bunny school, the hedgehog school, etc. At the end of the day Pom returns home to tell Momo about all that s/he is looking forward to in Kindergarten, and Momo asserts she will be right there waiting to hear about those adventures. The one editorial adjustment I would have wished for was more distinction in the font between the paragraphs on each page that tell the through story and the blurbs that share the details. The reader is unlikely to read all the words on every page every time they peruse the book, but for read-aloud purposes, it would be better if the continuing story stood out a little better, as it sometimes gets lost among all the other words on the pages.

It’s a sweet story, told mostly in pictures, with limited, repeated text. When a young bear asks his mom to make blueberry cake, she points out that they need blueberries. He sets out very excitedly and finds and picks and eats blueberries, until he is distracted by a butterfly to a field of flowers, which he picks to fill his bucket. Upon returning home, he asks his mom again about blueberry cake, but when she asks again about blueberries, he has only flowers to offer. The next morning he rises early, picks blueberries, and leaves the bucket full for his mother to find, and they enjoy their blueberry cake together alongside a beautiful bouquet, until he asks about applesauce… Its simplicity makes it great for emergent readers, and in particular, the way the same words are used with varying punctuation makes it great for teaching about punctuation and context as clues for reading with expression.

I love the illustrations in this book: they are bright and beautiful and full of feeling. And I love the idea/purpose guiding the book: it’s about being comfortable in your own skin and not body shaming ourselves. I just didn’t like the story as much as I wanted to: it came across as rather preachy and pedantic. It is about a young Bangladeshi-American girl who is excited and confident about starting school for the first time, but is questioning comments she hears her family members make about their weight. At school she hears a boy tease another girl about looking fat. That night at dinner she puts all the pieces together and declares herself on a diet, turning down her favorite dinner. Her family gathers around her and explain their own mistaken thinkings and her mother tells her that “beauty is how you make people feel and the kind things you do,” and then all is right with the world again. I just wish it had been more subtle with more story and less preaching. It’s an important message, but it was delivered in too heavily handed a manner.

The illustrations are all in earth tones, very suited to the topic, as the text shares about a variety of animals that are skilled builders, from the Great Barrier Reef to a penguin’s pebble nest to a beaver’s dam, and so on. The examples provide a good mix of familiar and less common. Several pages are given to each example so that there is some depth of detail, including why the animals build what they do. A solid choice.

D and the other letters are a bit put out with Apostrofee for gobbling up so many letters and taking their places. It’s full of examples to show the purpose of an apostrophe.. It’s cute, but I think I’ve seen other books that do the job better. A lot of the examples in this one are not common uses and/or don’t follow the usual pattern, and yet no explanation is given (i.e. shan’t, d’ssert, s’pose, d’plorable). At first I wondered why they misspelled Apostrofee’s name, but then I noticed the author is from Quebec, so it could be a Canadian spelling.

I need to buy several copies to have on hand for baby shower gifts. It’s a beautiful book, best shared between parent and young child. The illustrations are gloriously beautiful and whimsical. The text is sentimental and full of hope and wonderings for the future. It’s full of comparisons of child and nature, opening with an acorn sleeping beneath a blanket of leaves until it begins to grow, just like the child tucked into a warm bed. The voice is that of the parent speaking directly to the child, offering a wide variety of possibilities and analogies. It makes my heart warm and fuzzy!

It’s a fun, simple, “sweet” read, with a devilish twist at the end that will appeal to the older elementary kids as well as the young ones. When Sloth and Lemur happen upon a rather lovely cake, they ponder having a party, but all the guests they consider inviting seem problematic in one way or another. They finally conclude there’s just no one left to eat it except themselves. As they lay about among the crumbs with full bellies, along comes Tiger, outraged that the lovely cake he’d made himself for his birthday is gone. Sloth apologizes, but Tiger tells them not to worry…(page turn)…he can still get it back…(page turn)… And the final page just shows the Tiger walking away with a satisfied expression from the plate of cake crumbs, with no Sloth or Lemur in sight. Draw your own conclusions. I like that it leaves it open to the readers’ interpretations — a good opportunity to talk about inference. It reminds me a bit of my favorite Jon Klassen books. My only critique is that it is told entirely in dialogue without any quotation marks or he said/she said (it uses different fonts to distinguish who says what), and it could have been helpful if the different fonts were a little more different to be really clear.

Well I pretty much love most things Melissa Stewart has written, and this one illustrated my another of my favorites, Steve Jenkins. The book shares details about fourteen different kind of monkeys that all live in the Manu National Park in Peru. It begins by pointing out that it is unusual for so many different kinds of monkeys to live in the same area, and that it is possible because they each live at different heights above the ground, behave in different ways, and eat different foods, meaning they don’t compete with each other for food or space. Each two-page spread is dedicated to a different kind of monkey, with a two line rhyming stanza in a large font for younger readers, and a more detailed paragraph for those seeking more information. Accompanying each illustration is a silhouette of a tree marking the height within the rainforest that that monkey occupies. In the back of the book a larger version of the same silhouette shows all the monkeys on one, and an illustration depicts all the monkey sizes in relative scale, alongside the shadow of an adult human for comparison purposes, and further statistics such as lifespan, scientific names, diets, and predators are listed for each monkey.

So I looked online at the professional reviews posted on the Titlewave website, and they were all more or less generally positive, but I’m just going to be honest and say I didn’t like it. I couldn’t find a plot or purpose to it. The illustrations depict a town made up of 51% vampires, and are suitably dark for such a setting, and yet are silly and cartoonish for a young audience. The reader is invited to come visit this town and is shown assorted scenes one might find looking down upon the town on a typical night. The text isn’t so much a narrative as a series of captions.

It’s a cute, simple story outlining the differences between rabbits and hares. Cartoon-like illustrations depict a conversation between a hare and a ground squirrel as they walk through the dessert. The hare takes objection to being called a rabbit by the ground squirrel, and in the process of arguing his point he gets so riled up that when the coyote that’s been stalking him throughout the book finally pounces with a, “Gotcha, Rabbit!” the hare punches him out with an, “I’m a hare! So there, Jackal!” The back of the book lists some other animals that are similar, but not the same, and outlines distinguishing differences; and also offers readers a Can-you-find-them list of other desert creatures that made appearances in the illustrations so they can go back and hunt.

I like the concept of the book, but I wish it made its point clear more consistently. It’s about the idea that size is relative and how something that may seem small to a person could seem huge to an insect. It tries to draw relative comparisons, such as pointing out that some fleas can jump up to 100 times their own height, and then declaring that would be like you being able to jump to the top of the Eiffel Tower. But then it says that the Eiffel Tower is 1063 feet tall, and since I don’t know any 10-foot tall people, that comparison doesn’t compute. And the comparison to “If your foot could grow as fast as a caterpillar can…” comes out as a bit awkward, because it’s not comparing to how a caterpillar’s foot grows, but the whole caterpillar, but for the person it’s got the foot growing independently of the rest of the human. It’s just a bit clunky.

I don’t like it. It’s supposed to be a Level One early reader, but it’s got a lot more big words than the level two books I’ve read from the same series. It tries to invite interaction by telling the reader to give Bunny a high five or poke him on his elbow, but the story is kind of lame: Bear tells us that Bunny is noisy everywhere, they go to the library, Bunny is noisy there too, and then they go to a movie where they both get shushed by others in the audience for talking about how hard it is to be quiet.

It’s very much a VERY early reader (Ready-to-Read Ready-to-Go!, which comes before Pre-Level one). It has only one to two sentences per page, and those are very short, direct, and repetitive, to the point of stilted reading. Normally stilted writing annoys me, but this works almost like a wordless book, where the bright, amusing illustrations tell a complete story even without the text: Cat and Dog play tricks on each other, taking turns claiming possession of a stuffed dinosaur until one of the tricks backfires and the dinosaur falls down a hole, where Mouse gets to claim it; Cat and Dog solve their problem by working together to put on a play to earn enough money so they can each purchase their own stuffed toy, which makes Mouse happy too, since he’s the storekeeper who gets their money.

I’m picky about early readers, and I like this one. The familiar characters (Farmer Brown and his crew) will draw kids in, and the amusing illustrations support the text. The sentences are simple and repetitive enough to support emergent readers, but they still manage to tell a story kids can relate to — heading off on an adventure, everybody enjoying their own preferred amusements, and then coming together to roast marshmallows over a campfire.

I’m picky about early readers, and I like this one. The sentences are simple without being stilted. There’s enough repetitiveness to the text to support emergent readers. But there’s still an amusing story to it. The entertaining illustrations and familiar characters (Farmer Brown and his crew) and familiar situation (staying cool in a pool on a hot day) will all help draw kids in and give them reasons to connect with the story.

It gets points for repetitive, predictable text patterns and for rhyming and for attractive illustrations that support the text while presenting students with examples of a wide variety of birds in different settings. It also gets points for providing extra information in the back for those who are curious. My complaint with the book is that it fails to use complete sentence structure. The repetitive pattern used consists of “Bird (preposition) a (noun), (verb).” I would have been so much happier with it if it had included, “There is a…” at the beginning of each, or even if each had started with “A” and the comma had been replaced with “is.” Providing young students with many examples of good grammar is part of language learning. This one sets an example of sentence fragments, which has a place in poetry, but I didn’t find especially suitable to this format.

Because it is an early reader (Ready-to-Read level 1), the information is pretty basic, but it’s not a bad choice for what it is, though it can’t exactly be called substantial. With one to three sentences per page, it simply but accurately describes how the earth formed, how volcanoes form, and how they continue to shape/change the earth’s landscape. Clear, simple drawing help enhance the text to convey meaning.

For an early reader (Ready-to-Read level two) it packs in a solid amount of information. It’s written in a tone that expresses enthusiasm for the topic. It’s illustrated with a combination of color photos and cartoonish drawings and charts. The graphics add to the appeal without distracting from the text. It’s a solid choice to pique the curiosity of young readers.

I’m sorry, but the story is boring and the sentences are stilted. It tells about some classmates who are competing in a relay race. It tells us they struggle when they practice and that they win in the end, but there’s nothing that makes the reader care one way or the other.