I didn’t find it particularly well-written.  There was a lot of repetitiveness. The use of bullets was forced, like they just wanted credit for including non-fiction text features.  It does include a lot of time-period photos, but not nearly enough to support the text on a topic is inherently a visual one and which may be very unfamiliar to many readers (e.g. on the page describing women’s hats, the text describes five different kinds of hats, but only one is pictured).